Ariston Publications strives to push the boundaries of knowledge in various academic fields through the rapid dissemination of high-quality research. Our primary goal is to offer a dynamic platform for scientists, scholars, and researchers to exchange their latest findings and innovations, promoting collaboration and advancing the science and technology. To ensure a seamless submission process and uphold the highest standards of publication ethics, authors are encouraged to adhere to the following comprehensive guidelines. Adhering to these guidelines ensures clarity, consistency, and adherence to best practices in manuscript preparation, ultimately contributing to the quality and impact of the published work.
General Information
Types of articles
Journal welcomes the publication of various types of articles:
Original Research Articles: These articles present novel research findings, methodologies, or theoretical frameworks in the field of materials science. Original research articles are not restricted by word count, except for the abstract, which must adhere to a 250-word limit. Authors are encouraged to present their content concisely in accordance with the journal’s standards. Original research articles typically include sections such as Introduction, Methods, Results, Discussion, and Conclusion. Maximum number of allowed figures for Original research articles are 15.
Review Articles: State-of-the-art review articles provide comprehensive summaries and analyses of existing research literature on specific topics within materials science. They often offer insights into recent advancements, current trends, and future directions in the field. Review articles have no restrictions on page limits and should include a table of contents. Authors are encouraged to provide biographies and photos for all contributors following the reference section. It is imperative to cite proper references in the captions of all previously published figures, tables, and illustrations, including the authors’ own work. Furthermore, authors must obtain copyright permissions from relevant publishers and authors.
Short Communications: Short communications are concise research articles that present significant findings or preliminary results in a brief format. They provide a rapid means of sharing important discoveries with the scientific community. Short communications are concise and should not surpass 2500 words, encompassing elements such as the title page, author affiliations, abstract, keywords, main text, table and figure captions, acknowledgments, and so on. The reference section is excluded from the word count limit. Additionally, short communications should include no more than 20 references.
Perspective Articles: Perspective articles offer personal viewpoints, opinions, or reflections on key issues, debates, or emerging trends in materials science. They provide insights from experts in the field and stimulate discussion among researchers. Normally, the perspective articles are invited by the journal editors.
Editorials: Editorials are written by the editorial board or guest editors and provide introductions, commentary, or reflections on the content featured in a specific issue of the journal. They may also highlight important developments or initiatives in the field.
Letters to the Editor: Letters to the editor allow readers to communicate feedback, comments, or questions regarding published articles or other aspects of the journal. They provide a platform for scholarly discourse and engagement with the journal’s content.
Quick Guide to Authors
Welcome to Ariston Publications! Below is a guide to assist authors in preparing and submitting their manuscript:
Manuscript Preparation:
- Originality: Ensuring the originality of your manuscript is crucial to maintaining the integrity of scientific research. Authors should conduct thorough literature reviews to ensure their work contributes novel insights to the field.
- Formatting: Proper formatting ensures clarity and consistency in presentation. Authors should follow the journal’s specific formatting guidelines regarding font size, style, margins, and line spacing to enhance readability and adherence to journal standards.
- Title and Abstract: The title should succinctly capture the essence of the research, while the abstract provides a concise summary of the study’s objectives, methods, results, and conclusions. Both should be carefully crafted to attract readers’ attention and accurately represent the manuscript’s content.
- Keywords: Selecting relevant keywords is essential for enhancing the discoverability of the manuscript. Authors should choose terms that accurately reflect the main topics and themes addressed in the study to facilitate indexing and searchability.
- Introduction: Provide a clear and compelling introduction that outlines the background, objectives, and significance of your research. The introduction lays the groundwork for the research by furnishing background details, articulating research objectives, and underscored the study’s importance within the broader scope of the field. It should be clear, concise, and engaging to captivate the reader’s interest
- Materials and Methods: Detailed descriptions of the materials, experimental procedures, and methodologies employed in the study are essential for reproducibility and transparency. Authors should provide sufficient information to enable other researchers to replicate the experiments and verify the results.
- Results and Discussion: Presenting the results objectively and discussing their implications within the context of existing literature is critical for advancing scientific knowledge. Authors should analyze the findings, identify patterns or trends, and compare them with previous studies to provide meaningful insights into the research area.
- Conclusions: Concisely outline the primary findings of the research and deliberate on their wider implications. The conclusions should succinctly summarize the key findings of the study and their broader implications. Authors should avoid overstating the significance of their results and instead focus on providing a balanced interpretation supported by the data.
- References: Accurate and consistent citation of relevant literature is essential for acknowledging the contributions of previous research and supporting the validity of the current study. Authors should adhere to the specified citation style and ensure that all sources cited are properly referenced in the reference section.
Submission Process:
- Online Submission: Ariston Publications utilizes an online submission system for manuscript submission. Authors should carefully follow the instructions provided on the journal’s website to ensure a smooth and successful submission process. Make sure to follow the prescribed TEMPLATE for file submission.
- Cover Letter: A well-written cover letter accompanying the manuscript can provide valuable context and insight for the editors. Authors should use the cover letter to introduce their manuscript, highlight its significance and contribution to the field, and address any specific concerns or considerations.
- Manuscript Files: Authors are required to upload their manuscript, figures, tables, and any supplementary materials as separate files in the prescribed format. Care should be taken to ensure that all files are properly labeled and organized to facilitate the review process. Make sure to follow the designated TEMPLATE for file submission.
Ethical Considerations:
Plagiarism: Authors must ensure that their manuscript is free from plagiarism, including both direct copying and paraphrasing of text from other sources. Proper citation and attribution of sources are essential to avoid plagiarism and maintain academic integrity.
Conflicts of Interest: Authors must reveal any potential conflicts of interest that could impact the research process or the interpretation of findings. This may include financial interests, personal relationships, or affiliations that could be perceived as biased or conflicting.
Authorship: Authorship should reflect significant contributions to the conceptualization, design, implementation, or interpretation of the study. Those meeting these criteria should be listed as authors, while individuals not meeting them should be acknowledged for their contributions.
Review Process:
- Editorial Evaluation: Upon submission, your manuscript will undergo an initial editorial evaluation to ensure that it meets the journal’s criteria for scope, originality, and quality.
- Peer Review Process: Manuscripts submitted to Ariston Publications undergo a rigorous peer-review process to ensure the quality, validity, and significance of the research. Reviewers evaluate the manuscript based on scientific merit, methodological rigor, clarity of presentation, and adherence to ethical standards.
- Reviewer Feedback: You will receive feedback from the peer reviewers, which may include suggestions for revisions or clarifications. Address any comments or concerns raised by the reviewers in a timely manner.
Decision Process:
- Editorial Decision: Following the peer review process, the editors make a decision regarding the acceptance, revision, or rejection of the manuscript based on the reviewers’ feedback and the manuscript’s suitability for publication. Authors will be notified of the editorial decision and provided with guidance on any revisions required.
- Notification: You will be notified of the editorial decision via email. If revisions are requested, you will receive detailed instructions on how to address the reviewers’ comments.
- Revisions (if applicable): Revise your manuscript according to the feedback provided by the peer reviewers and the editorial team. Make sure to submit the revised manuscript within the specified timeframe.
Publication Process:
- Final Approval: Once your revised manuscript is submitted, it will undergo a final review to ensure that all revisions have been addressed satisfactorily.
- Proofreading: You will receive proofs of your manuscript for final approval before publication. Review the proofs carefully for any errors or inaccuracies.
- Publication: Upon final approval, your manuscript will be published online in MatSci Express. You will receive information about the publication date and a link to access your published article.
- Open Access: MatSci Express follows an open access policy, making your research freely available to readers worldwide. Your published article will be accessible on the journal’s website, maximizing its impact and visibility in the scientific community.
Publication Ethics:
Ariston Publications is committed to upholding the highest standards of publication ethics and integrity. Authors are expected to conduct their research ethically, adhere to relevant ethical guidelines and regulations, and accurately report their findings without fabrication, falsification, or plagiarism.
Contact Us:
For any inquiries or assistance regarding the submission process, authors can contact the editorial office at the provided contact email or phone number. The editorial team is available to provide support and guidance throughout the publication process. For any inquiry, please contact at: info@aristonpubs.com.
Submission Checklist
- Designate a corresponding author: A corresponding author with full contact details (Email, Phone, Full postal address) should be provided.
- Uploaded Files: Ensure that all necessary files have been uploaded, including:
- Graphical Abstract (Colored graphical figure with short description of the work)
- Research Highlights (3-5 bullet points)
- Cover Letter
- Manuscript file which include
- Title page including manuscript title, authors names and their affiliations, corresponding author name, email, phone number, and postal address.
- Abstract
- Keywords
- Text
- Figures with appropriate captions and proper citation inside the main text
- Tables with appropriate captions and proper citation inside the main text
- Acknowledgements, if applicable
- Conflict of Interest Statement
- Authors contribution statement
- References (Ensure that all references cited in the main text are listed in the reference list as per the provided format.)
- Supplementary files, if applicable.
- A list of 3 reviewers should be provided who might review the manuscript.
- Manuscript should be prepared in correct English language. Spell and grammar checked should be done before the submission
- Permission should be obtained for the copyrighted material from the original source, if applicable.
Manuscript Preparation:
General Information
Language and Submission Method: Ensure that manuscripts are written in English and submitted electronically via our online submission system. This facilitates efficient processing and review.
Formatting Guidelines: Authors should strictly adhere to the journal’s formatting guidelines, available in the Manuscript Template downloadable from our website. These guidelines ensure consistency and adherence to publication standards.
Clarity and Organization: Manuscripts should be concise, well-organized, and written with clarity. This enhances readability and understanding of the research presented, contributing to the overall quality of the publication.
Abbreviations: In instances where abbreviations are not commonly recognized within the field, it is imperative to define them in a footnote on the first page of the article. Additionally, any abbreviations deemed necessary in the abstract should be defined at their initial mention within the abstract itself and reiterated in the footnote. Consistency in the use of abbreviations throughout the article is crucial for clarity and comprehension. Therefore, authors should ensure uniformity in the application of abbreviations across all sections of the manuscript.
Nomenclature and Units: Adhering to internationally accepted rules and conventions is paramount when presenting nomenclature and units within a manuscript. The use of the International System of Units (SI) is strongly recommended. In cases where other units or quantities are referenced, it is essential to provide their equivalents in SI units. Authors are encouraged to consult authoritative sources such as the International Union of Pure and Applied Chemistry (IUPAC) Nomenclature of Organic Chemistry for comprehensive guidance on nomenclature conventions. By following these standards, authors ensure consistency, accuracy, and adherence to established scientific practices.
Title Page: Each submission should include a title page containing essential information:
Names and Affiliations of All Authors: Provide the full names and institutional affiliations of all contributing authors.
Corresponding Author’s Contact Information: Include the contact details of the corresponding author, such as email address and affiliation. This facilitates communication throughout the submission and review process.
Manuscript Structure
The manuscript structure outlined here provides a systematic framework for organizing and presenting research findings in a clear, coherent, and comprehensive manner. Each section plays a distinct yet interconnected role in communicating the research process, outcomes, and implications to the scientific community.
Title of the Manuscript: The title should accurately reflect the content and focus of the research.
Abstract: A succinct and informative abstract is necessary for any research manuscript. It should succinctly outline the research’s objectives, key findings, and principal conclusions. Since abstracts are often read independently of the full article, they must effectively summarize the study’s essence. Authors should refrain from using non-standard or uncommon abbreviations. If unavoidable, such abbreviations must be defined upon their first mention within the abstract itself to ensure clarity and comprehension. Thus, a concise and informative abstract, not exceeding 250 words, should be included.
Keywords: Authors are encouraged to provide 3-5 keywords below the abstract to facilitate indexing and enhance the discoverability of the manuscript. Carefully selected keywords improve the visibility of the publication in relevant databases and search engines.
Introduction: The introduction serves as the gateway to the research, providing readers with a concise yet comprehensive overview of the study’s background, objectives, and significance. It lays the groundwork for the research by presenting relevant literature, defining the research problem, and clearly stating the study’s aims and objectives. By contextualizing the research within the broader scientific landscape, the introduction sets the stage for the subsequent sections of the manuscript.
Experimental Section: The experimental section provides a detailed account of the materials, methods, and procedures employed in the study. It offers sufficient information to enable reproducibility, allowing other researchers to replicate the experiments and validate the findings. Authors should meticulously describe the experimental setup, including any equipment or instruments used, as well as the procedures followed to collect and analyze data. Clear and precise documentation of the experimental methodology enhances the transparency and credibility of the research.
Results and Discussion: In the results and discussion section, authors present the outcomes of the study and critically analyze their implications. This section is where the research findings are showcased, often through the use of tables, figures, and graphs. Authors should interpret the results in the context of existing literature, highlighting any significant trends, patterns, or deviations observed. Discussion of the findings should delve into their broader implications, addressing how they contribute to advancing scientific knowledge and understanding. This section may also encompass comparisons with previous studies, explanations for unexpected results, and suggestions for future research directions.
Conclusion: The conclusion encapsulates the main findings of the study and emphasizes their significance in relation to the research objectives. It provides a concise summary of the key findings, reiterating the main points discussed in the results and discussion section. Authors may also offer insights into the practical implications of the research and propose avenues for further investigation. By synthesizing the study’s outcomes, the conclusion reinforces the study’s contribution to the field and underscores its relevance and potential impact.
Figures: In the realm of academic publishing, figures serve as vital tools for visually communicating complex data and findings. To ensure their effectiveness, figures should adhere to rigorous standards of quality and clarity. The resolution for all figures should not be less than 300 dpi.
High-Quality Presentation: Figures should be meticulously crafted to uphold a standard of excellence in visual representation. Clear imaging and precise labeling are essential to facilitate comprehension and interpretation by readers. Authors should prioritize the creation of visually appealing and informative figures that enhance the overall professionalism of the manuscript.
File Format and Resolution: Authors must adhere to specific file format and resolution requirements when submitting figures. Figures should be provided in TIFF, JPEG, or EPS format to ensure compatibility with the publication process. Additionally, figures must maintain a minimum resolution of 300 dots per inch (dpi) to guarantee optimal clarity and legibility. Compliance with these standards ensures seamless integration of figures into the manuscript and enhances their visual impact.
Tables: Tables play a fundamental role in organizing and presenting data in a structured and accessible format. Proper formatting and presentation of tables are essential to facilitate understanding and interpretation by readers.
Editability and Format: Authors are advised to ensure that tables are editable and provided in DOC or DOCX format. This enables ease of access and manipulation, allowing for efficient formatting adjustments or updates as necessary. Providing tables in editable formats enhances their usability and facilitates any necessary revisions or modifications during the publication process.
Clarity and Organization: Tables should be meticulously organized and clearly labeled to facilitate easy comprehension by readers. Authors should employ concise and informative table titles and headings, ensuring that data are presented logically and coherently. Clear formatting and consistent use of fonts and styles contribute to the overall professionalism and readability of the tables within the manuscript.
Reference style:
References in the manuscript must adhere to the Harvard style, presented on a dedicated page and numbered in accordance with their appearance in the text. Numerical citations in the text should be enclosed within brackets [X], corresponding to the sequential order of references listed at the end of the manuscript. The formatting for listing references follows the Harvard Referencing format. Example for the references are as follows:
Journal Articles:
[1] Li, Y., Min, J., Jiang, Y., Dong, T., Xu, D., Feng, Z., Yan, Y., Garoufalis, C.S., Baskoutas, S., Shen, H. and Zeng, Z., 2024. Rational Design of Tetrahedral Derivatives as Efficient Light-Emitting Materials Based on “Super Atom” Perspective. Nano Letters, 24(10), pp.3237-3242.
Book:
[1] Andrews, D., Nann, T. and Lipson, R.H., 2019. Comprehensive Nanoscience and Nanotechnology. Academic press.
Book Chapters:
[1] Benelmekki, M. and Erbe, A., 2019. Nanostructured thin films–background, preparation and relation to the technological revolution of the 21st century. In Frontiers of Nanoscience (Vol. 14, pp. 1-34). Elsevier.
For Patents:
[1] Rogers, J.A., Rockett, A.A., Nuzzo, R., Yoon, J. and Baca, A., University of Illinois, 2015. Arrays of ultrathin silicon solar microcells. U.S. Patent 9,105,782.
Instructions to prepare Graphical Abstract
Authors are required to submit a graphical abstract along with the manuscript for publication in the journal. A graphical abstract serves as a visual summary of the article, providing readers with a quick overview of the research findings. Below are guidelines on how to prepare a graphical abstract and the limitations for its description:
Preparing a Graphical Abstract:
Content: Graphical abstract should highlight the key points of the research, including the main objectives, methodologies, and significant findings.
Design: Preferably, use color to enhance the visual appeal of the graphical abstract. Ensure that the design is clear, concise, and visually engaging.
Size: The maximum dimensions for the graphical abstract should be 4 cm (Height) X 10 cm (Width).
Resolution: Maintain a resolution of at least 300 dots per inch (dpi) to ensure clarity and legibility.
Submission: Submit the graphical abstract as a separate file along with the manuscript during the submission process.
Limitations for the Description of the Graphical Abstract:
Length: The description accompanying the graphical abstract should be concise and limited to a maximum of 20 words.
Content: Focus on conveying the unique aspects and key findings of the research within the limited word count.
Clarity: Ensure that the description provides a clear and accurate summary of the graphical abstract, enabling readers to grasp the essence of the research at a glance.
We encourage authors to adhere to these guidelines to create an effective graphical abstract that complements your manuscript.
ETHICAL COMPLIANCE:
Authors who submit manuscripts to our journal are required to maintain high ethical standards throughout their research endeavors. This entails, among other responsibilities, ensuring compliance with pertinent ethical guidelines and regulations, securing approvals from institutional review boards or ethics committees as necessary, and obtaining informed consent from participants when appropriate. Top of Form
Authors should also disclose any potential conflicts of interest, including sources of funding or any affiliations that may influence the interpretation of the research findings.
Authors Contribution Statement:
Within the Author Contribution Statement, authors must distinctly delineate the precise contributions of each participant in the research endeavor. These contributions may encompass conceptualization, methodology, data gathering and analysis, manuscript drafting, editing, and review. Each author should provide a brief description of their role in the study to ensure transparency and accountability in authorship.
Informed Consent Statement:
Authors conducting research involving human subjects are obligated to obtain informed consent from participants prior to their involvement in the study. The Informed Consent Statement should detail the procedures followed to obtain consent, including information provided to participants about the purpose of the study, risks and benefits, confidentiality, and their right to withdraw participation at any time. Authors should also specify whether written or verbal consent was obtained and provide assurance that participants’ rights were respected throughout the research process.
Acknowledgements:
The Acknowledgements section provides authors with the opportunity to express gratitude to individuals or organizations that contributed to the research project but do not meet the criteria for authorship. This may include funding agencies, research assistants, technical support staff, or colleagues who provided valuable feedback or assistance. Authors should ensure that all individuals acknowledged have granted permission to be included in the Acknowledgements section.
Conflict of Interest:
Authors are required to disclose any possible conflicts of interest that might affect the research process or the interpretation of the results. This encompasses financial interests, employment connections, consulting agreements, or personal associations that could sway the outcomes or give rise to a perception of partiality. Authors should provide a clear statement indicating any conflicts of interest and describe how they were managed throughout the research process to maintain integrity and objectivity.
Authorship Changes:
Authors are strongly advised to carefully deliberate the composition and sequence of authors before submitting their manuscript. The final roster of authors should be furnished upon initial submission. Any modifications to the authorship—whether additions, deletions, or reordering—must be proposed prior to the manuscript’s acceptance and necessitate approval from the Editor. To initiate an authorship change, the corresponding author must furnish the Editor with the following: (a) A comprehensive rationale for the proposed alteration in the author list. (b) Written confirmation, such as an email or letter, from all authors endorsing the addition, removal, or reordering of authors. In cases of additions or removals, consent from the affected author is also mandated. Exceptions to this protocol are granted sparingly. Requests for authorship adjustments post-acceptance will be evaluated by the Editor, albeit only under extraordinary circumstances. Throughout the deliberation process, publication of the manuscript will be temporarily halted. In instances where the manuscript has already been published online, any approved changes will be accompanied by a corrigendum.