As the publisher of Ariston Publications, we are committed to upholding the highest standards of publication ethics to ensure the integrity, credibility, and trustworthiness of the scholarly literature we disseminate. Our publication ethics policies are guided by principles of transparency, fairness, accountability, and respect for intellectual integrity.
By upholding these publication ethics principles, Ariston Publications aims to maintain the trust and confidence of the scholarly community and contribute to the advancement of knowledge in an ethical and responsible manner.
Here are the detailed aspects of our publication ethics framework:
Ethical Guidelines: Ariston Publications adheres to established ethical guidelines and best practices in scholarly publishing, including those outlined by organizations such as the Committee on Publication Ethics (COPE) (https://publicationethics.org/core-practices), the International Committee of Medical Journal Editors (ICMJE), and the Council of Science Editors (CSE). We provide clear guidance to authors, reviewers, and editors on ethical conduct throughout the publication process.
Authorship and Attribution: We uphold principles of authorship integrity, requiring all individuals who have made significant contributions to a manuscript to be listed as authors. Authors are responsible for ensuring the accuracy and integrity of their work, including appropriate citation of sources and acknowledgment of contributions from others. Any individuals or organizations that have contributed to the research but do not meet the criteria for authorship should be acknowledged in the manuscript.
Originality and Plagiarism: Ariston Publications strictly prohibits plagiarism, including the unauthorized use of others’ ideas, text, or data without proper attribution. Authors are required to submit original work that has not been published previously and is not under consideration for publication elsewhere. We employ plagiarism detection software to screen submitted manuscripts and take appropriate action if plagiarism is detected.
Conflicts of Interest: Authors, reviewers, and editors are required to disclose any potential conflicts of interest that could bias their judgment or influence the research process or publication decisions. Conflicts of interest may arise from financial relationships, professional affiliations, or personal beliefs that could affect objectivity. Transparency in disclosing conflicts of interest helps maintain the credibility and integrity of the publication process.
Peer Review Integrity: Peer review is a cornerstone of scholarly publishing, and Ariston Publications is committed to ensuring the integrity and rigor of the peer review process. We select qualified reviewers who possess the expertise and objectivity to evaluate manuscripts fairly and provide constructive feedback. Reviewers are expected to conduct their assessments impartially, maintain confidentiality, and disclose any conflicts of interest.
Editorial Independence: Ariston Publications upholds the editorial independence of its editorial boards and editors, ensuring that editorial decisions are based on the merit of the research and the principles of scholarly integrity. Editors are responsible for evaluating manuscripts objectively, without undue influence from commercial interests, personal biases, or external pressures.
Corrections and Retractions: In cases of identified errors, inaccuracies, or ethical breaches in published articles, Ariston Publications will take prompt corrective action, including issuing corrections, retractions, or expressions of concern as necessary. We prioritize transparency and accountability in addressing and rectifying errors to maintain the credibility of the scholarly record.
Data Integrity and Reproducibility: Authors are expected to provide access to raw data and research materials to support the transparency, reproducibility, and verifiability of their findings. Ariston Publications encourages authors to adhere to best practices in data management and sharing to facilitate the validation and replication of research results.
Ethical Oversight: Ariston Publications maintains oversight of the publication process to ensure compliance with ethical standards and guidelines. We appoint qualified editorial staff and editorial boards to oversee manuscript handling, peer review, and editorial decision-making. Editors and reviewers are trained to recognize and address ethical issues that may arise during the publication process.
Community Engagement and Education: Ariston Publications is committed to fostering a culture of ethical conduct and responsible publishing within the scholarly community. We engage with authors, reviewers, editors, and other stakeholders through educational initiatives, workshops, and outreach activities to promote awareness of publication ethics and best practices.
Duties of the Publisher
As Ariston Publications, our commitment to scholarly excellence drives our actions and shapes our responsibilities as a publisher. We recognize the importance of our role in facilitating the dissemination of knowledge and advancing the frontiers of research. As the publisher of Ariston Publications, we consider it our utmost responsibility to uphold the highest standards of quality, integrity, and ethics in scholarly publishing. As the publisher of Ariston Publications, our duties encompass ensuring publication integrity, upholding ethical standards, maintaining quality assurance, supporting authors, recognizing reviewers, promoting open access, fostering editorial independence, continuous improvement, and engaging with the scholarly community. We are committed to advancing knowledge and scholarship through rigorous, transparent, and ethical publishing practices. Here are the detailed duties that we, as Ariston Publications, undertake to fulfill our mission:
Publication Integrity: Ariston Publications is committed to maintaining the integrity and credibility of the scholarly literature. This involves ensuring that all published works undergo thorough peer review and editorial assessment to uphold academic standards and promote excellence in research. We strive to publish research that is scientifically sound, methodologically rigorous, and contributes meaningfully to the advancement of knowledge in various fields.
Publication Ethics: Ethical considerations are paramount in scholarly publishing. Ariston Publications adheres to strict publication ethics and standards, including policies on plagiarism, authorship, and conflicts of interest. As the publisher, we adhere to the highest ethical standards and expect all stakeholders involved in the publication process to do the same. This includes authors, reviewers, and editorial board members. We have established ethical guidelines and policies to ensure transparency, integrity, and fairness throughout the publication process, from manuscript submission to final publication. We provide clear guidelines to authors, reviewers, and editors to uphold ethical conduct throughout the publication process.
Ethical Standards: Upholding ethical standards is paramount in scholarly publishing. We have established clear guidelines and policies to address issues such as plagiarism, data fabrication, and conflicts of interest. These guidelines are designed to ensure that all published research is conducted and reported ethically and transparently, thereby maintaining the trust and integrity of the scientific literature.
Quality Assurance: Quality assurance is essential to maintaining the reputation and credibility of our journals. We implement measures to ensure the quality and accuracy of published content, including thorough editorial oversight and post-publication checks. Our goal is to maintain the integrity of the scholarly record and address any errors or ethical breaches promptly. We have a dedicated editorial team and peer reviewers who assess manuscripts based on scientific merit, originality, and significance. Our goal is to publish high-quality research that meets the standards of academic excellence and contributes to the advancement of scholarship in various disciplines
Editorial Independence: Editorial independence is fundamental to the integrity of our journals. Ariston Publications upholds the principle of editorial independence, ensuring that the decisions of our editorial boards and editors are free from undue influence. We support the editorial autonomy of our editors and editorial board members, allowing them to make decisions based on academic merit and without undue influence from external parties. We respect the expertise and judgment of our editors in managing the peer review process and determining the editorial content of our journals
Peer Review Process: We maintain a rigorous peer review process to evaluate the quality and originality of submitted manuscripts. Our commitment to impartiality, transparency, and confidentiality ensures the integrity of the peer review process.
Author Support: Authors are at the heart of scholarly publishing, and we are dedicated to providing them with comprehensive support throughout the publication process. This includes offering guidance on manuscript preparation, submission procedures, and responding to reviewer comments. Our aim is to facilitate a smooth and efficient publication experience for authors and ensure that their research reaches its intended audience.
Reviewer Recognition: Peer reviewers play a crucial role in the peer review process, and we value their contributions to maintaining the quality and integrity of our journals. We recognize and appreciate the time, expertise, and constructive feedback provided by reviewers in evaluating manuscripts. Reviewer recognition initiatives are in place to acknowledge the invaluable contributions of our reviewers to the scholarly community.
Access and Archiving: Ariston Publications is committed to enhancing access to published research by promoting open access policies and collaborating with digital repositories and indexing services. We ensure the long-term archiving and preservation of published content for future generations.
Copyright and Licensing: We establish clear copyright and licensing policies to govern the use and distribution of published content. Our aim is to respect authors’ rights while facilitating broad dissemination and reuse of scholarly articles.
Transparency and Accountability: Ariston Publications operates with transparency and accountability, providing clear information about editorial policies, peer review procedures, and potential conflicts of interest. We maintain open channels of communication with all stakeholders and welcome feedback and inquiries.
Continuous Improvement: Ariston Publications is committed to continuous improvement and innovation in scholarly publishing. We strive for continuous improvement in publishing practices, embracing new technologies and best practices to enhance the quality and efficiency of scholarly communication. We regularly review and update our policies, processes, and practices to adapt to evolving trends and best practices in academic publishing. Feedback from stakeholders is actively sought and incorporated to enhance the quality and relevance of our publications. Our commitment to professional development ensures that our staff is equipped to meet the evolving needs of the research community.
Community Engagement: Engagement with the scholarly community is essential to the success of our journals. Ariston Publications actively engages with the scholarly community, fostering collaboration and promoting open science initiatives. We seek feedback from stakeholders to inform our decision-making and improve our publishing services. We actively seek input and feedback from authors, reviewers, editorial board members, and readers to foster collaboration, dialogue, and knowledge sharing. We value the diverse perspectives and expertise of our stakeholders and strive to create a supportive and inclusive publishing environment
Duties of Editors
For Ariston Publications, Editors play a pivotal role in upholding the standards of excellence, integrity, and ethical conduct within our scholarly publishing endeavors. The duties of editors encompass a range of responsibilities aimed at ensuring the quality, credibility, and fairness of the peer review process, as well as the integrity and rigor of the published literature. By fulfilling these duties with dedication, integrity, and professionalism, editors contribute to the advancement of knowledge, the dissemination of high-quality research, and the reputation and impact of Ariston Publications within the scholarly community and beyond. The leadership and expertise of the editors are invaluable in ensuring the continued success and excellence of our publishing endeavors. Here are the detailed duties of editors for Ariston Publications:
Editorial Oversight: Editors are entrusted with the responsibility of maintaining the overall quality and integrity of the journal. This entails ensuring that all published manuscripts meet the journal’s standards of excellence and relevance. Editors are expected to have a keen eye for identifying high-quality research and to exercise discernment in the selection of manuscripts for publication.
Peer Review Management: The peer review process is a cornerstone of scholarly publishing, and editors play a central role in managing this process. They are responsible for assigning manuscripts to appropriate reviewers who possess the necessary expertise to evaluate the work thoroughly. Editors must also ensure that the review process is conducted in a timely manner, with reviewers providing constructive feedback to authors to help improve the quality of their manuscripts.
Fair and Impartial Evaluation: Editors are obligated to evaluate all manuscripts objectively and impartially, regardless of factors such as the authors’ identity, affiliations, or backgrounds. This requires editors to set aside personal biases and prejudices and to judge each manuscript solely on its scientific merits. By maintaining fairness and impartiality, editors uphold the integrity of the peer review process and safeguard the credibility of the journal.
Confidentiality: Maintaining confidentiality is paramount in the editorial process. Editors must ensure that the content of submitted manuscripts and the identities of authors and reviewers remain confidential at all times. This includes safeguarding the confidentiality of peer review communications and protecting the intellectual property rights of authors. Upholding strict confidentiality builds trust among authors, reviewers, and stakeholders and fosters a secure and professional environment for scholarly discourse.
Ethical Oversight: Editors are tasked with upholding the highest standards of research ethics and integrity. They must be vigilant in identifying and addressing any potential ethical concerns or misconduct, such as plagiarism, data fabrication, or conflicts of interest. Editors play a crucial role in investigating allegations of misconduct and ensuring that appropriate actions are taken in accordance with established guidelines and procedures.
Quality Control: Editors are responsible for ensuring the accuracy, clarity, and coherence of published manuscripts. This involves conducting thorough editorial reviews to verify the accuracy of data, methods, and interpretations presented in the manuscripts. Editors must also address any discrepancies or inconsistencies identified during the review process and work with authors to rectify any issues prior to publication.
Compliance with Policies: Editors must ensure compliance with the journal’s policies, guidelines, and ethical standards, as well as relevant industry standards and best practices. This includes familiarizing themselves with the publication ethics guidelines and ensuring that all editorial decisions align with these principles. Editors are also responsible for communicating these policies to authors, reviewers, and other stakeholders and enforcing them consistently throughout the editorial process.
Communication and Transparency: Effective communication and transparency are essential for maintaining trust and credibility in the editorial process. Editors should provide clear and timely updates on the status of submitted manuscripts and respond promptly to inquiries and concerns from authors, reviewers, and other parties involved in the publication process. Open and transparent communication fosters collaboration and enhances the overall efficiency and effectiveness of editorial operations.
Conflict Resolution: Conflicts and disputes may occasionally arise during the editorial process, and editors are responsible for resolving these issues in a fair and equitable manner. This may involve mediating disagreements between authors, reviewers, or other parties and striving to reach mutually satisfactory resolutions. Editors should handle conflicts with professionalism and diplomacy, ensuring that all parties are treated with respect and that the integrity of the editorial process is upheld.
Continuous Improvement: Editors should actively seek opportunities for continuous improvement and innovation in editorial processes, policies, and practices. By staying informed about developments in scholarly publishing and incorporating best practices, editors can enhance the quality and efficiency of editorial operations. Continuous improvement ensures that the journal remains responsive to the evolving needs of the scholarly community and maintains its reputation for excellence.
Duties of Reviewers
Reviewers are entrusted as custodians of scholarly integrity and excellence, their meticulous contributions being indispensable in safeguarding the exacting standards of academic rigor and integrity throughout the peer review process. Within Ariston Publications, reviewers constitute a cornerstone in upholding the quality and integrity of our published works. Their responsibilities hold paramount importance in ensuring the caliber, authenticity, and credibility of scholarly literature. Reviewers’ unwavering dedication to expertise and excellence is fundamental in maintaining the high standards of academic rigor and integrity that characterize our esteemed journals. Presented below are the comprehensive duties expected of reviewers for Ariston Publications:
Timeliness: Reviewers are expected to promptly respond to review invitations and adhere to the agreed-upon timelines for completing their reviews. Timely reviews are essential for minimizing delays in the publication process and ensuring efficient manuscript handling.
Confidentiality: Reviewers must treat all manuscripts and review materials as confidential documents. They should not disclose any information about the manuscript or their review to anyone without explicit permission from the editorial team. Maintaining confidentiality is vital for preserving the integrity of the peer review process and protecting the anonymity of authors.
Objectivity and Impartiality: Reviewers should evaluate manuscripts objectively and impartially, focusing solely on the scientific merit and scholarly significance of the work. They should avoid personal biases or conflicts of interest that could influence their assessment of the manuscript. Reviews should be conducted in a fair and unbiased manner.
Expertise and Competence: Reviewers should accept review requests for manuscripts within their area of expertise and competence. They should possess the necessary knowledge and experience to evaluate the manuscript’s methodology, data analysis, interpretation, and conclusions effectively. If reviewers feel that they lack the expertise to assess certain aspects of the manuscript, they should notify the editorial team promptly.
Constructive Feedback: Reviewers are expected to provide authors with clear, constructive feedback to help them improve their manuscripts. They should identify strengths and weaknesses in the study design, methodology, presentation of results, and interpretation of findings. Reviewers should offer specific suggestions for revisions or additional experiments that could enhance the manuscript’s scientific rigor and impact.
Ethical Considerations: Reviewers should alert the editorial team to any potential ethical concerns or violations identified during the review process. This may include issues such as plagiarism, data fabrication or falsification, conflicts of interest, or ethical misconduct. Reviewers’ vigilance in upholding ethical standards contributes to the integrity and credibility of scholarly publications.
Transparency and Disclosure: Reviewers should disclose any conflicts of interest that could potentially bias their review. If reviewers have any affiliations, financial interests, or personal relationships that may affect their impartiality, they should declare them to the editorial team. Transparency in disclosing conflicts of interest fosters trust and transparency in the peer review process.
Respectful Communication: Reviewers should conduct their reviews with professionalism, courtesy, and respect for the authors’ work. They should avoid using language that is inflammatory, derogatory, or disrespectful. Reviewers’ comments should be constructive and focused on improving the quality of the manuscript.
Adherence to Guidelines: Reviewers should follow the guidelines provided by the editorial team for reviewing manuscripts. They should pay attention to any specific criteria or instructions outlined in the review invitation. Adhering to these guidelines helps ensure consistency and fairness in the peer review process.
Commitment to Excellence: Reviewers should strive for excellence in their reviews and aim to provide feedback that is thorough, insightful, and actionable. Their contributions as reviewers play a vital role in maintaining the quality and credibility of scholarly publications. Reviewers’ dedication to advancing scholarship and knowledge within their field is greatly appreciated.
Reviewer Recognition: Reviewer contributions are essential to the peer review process, and we value and appreciate their efforts. Reviewer recognition initiatives are in place to acknowledge and reward the contributions of our reviewers. Their expertise and dedication are instrumental in maintaining the quality and integrity of our publications.
Rules for Editors and Editorial Board members when submitting manuscripts to their own journals at Ariston Publications
Declaration of Conflict of Interest: Editors and Editorial Board members must declare any potential conflicts of interest when submitting manuscripts to their own journals. This includes any financial, personal, or professional affiliations that may influence the editorial decision-making process.
Recusal from Editorial Decisions: Editors and Editorial Board members should recuse themselves from the editorial decision-making process for their own submissions. This ensures impartiality and avoids any perceived or actual conflicts of interest.
Assignment of Handling Editor: Manuscripts submitted by Editors or Editorial Board members should be assigned to an independent Handling Editor who is not affiliated with the submitting author or their institution. This ensures fair and unbiased peer review.
Transparent Review Process: The review process for manuscripts submitted by Editors or Editorial Board members should be transparent and adhere to the same rigorous standards applied to all submissions. Reviewers should be selected based on expertise and independence, and their evaluations should be impartial and constructive.
Publication Decision: The final publication decision for manuscripts submitted by Editors or Editorial Board members should be made by the Editor-in-Chief or an independent Editorial Board member. This decision should be based solely on the scientific merit and quality of the manuscript, regardless of the author’s affiliation.
Disclosure of Editorial Relationship: Editors and Editorial Board members should transparently disclose their editorial relationship with the journal when submitting manuscripts. This information should be included in the manuscript cover letter or submission form.
Adherence to Ethical Guidelines: Editors and Editorial Board members must adhere to the publication ethics and guidelines established by Ariston Publications, including those related to authorship, plagiarism, and data integrity.
Confidentiality: Editors and Editorial Board members should maintain confidentiality throughout the review process and refrain from disclosing any confidential information related to their own submissions.
Handling of Appeals: In the event of an appeal related to the editorial decision on a manuscript submitted by an Editor or Editorial Board member, an independent editorial committee should be convened to review the appeal and make a final decision.
Continuous Monitoring: Ariston Publications will continuously monitor and evaluate the adherence of Editors and Editorial Board members to these rules and take appropriate action in cases of non-compliance or ethical breaches.
Top of Form
Conflict of Interest Policy for Ariston Publishers
This Conflict of Interest Policy is designed to uphold the ethical standards of Ariston Publishers and promote trust and integrity in scholarly publishing.
Policy Statement: Ariston Publishers is committed to maintaining the highest standards of integrity and transparency in the publication process. To uphold these principles, we have established a comprehensive Conflict of Interest Policy for authors, reviewers, and editors involved in the publication of manuscripts.
For Authors:
- Authors submitting manuscripts to Ariston Publishers must disclose any potential conflicts of interest that could influence their research findings or interpretation.
- Conflicts of interest may include financial interests, affiliations with organizations or institutions, personal relationships, or any other circumstances that could be perceived as biasing the research.
- Authors should provide a transparent declaration of all relevant conflicts of interest in the manuscript submission process.
- Failure to disclose conflicts of interest may result in the rejection of the manuscript or retraction of the published article.
For Reviewers:
- Reviewers selected to evaluate manuscripts for Ariston Publishers must disclose any conflicts of interest that could compromise their impartiality in the review process.
- Conflicts of interest may arise from personal or professional relationships with the authors, institutions, or funding sources associated with the manuscript under review.
- Reviewers should decline to review manuscripts where they have a conflict of interest that could bias their assessment.
- Reviewers must maintain confidentiality regarding the manuscripts they review and refrain from using privileged information for personal gain.
For Editors:
- Editors responsible for overseeing the publication process at Ariston Publishers must disclose any conflicts of interest that could affect their editorial decisions.
- Conflicts of interest may include financial interests, personal relationships with authors, or institutional affiliations relevant to the manuscripts under consideration.
- Editors should delegate editorial responsibilities or recuse themselves from handling manuscripts where they have a conflict of interest.
- Editorial decisions should be made impartially, based on the merit of the manuscript and adherence to publication standards, without influence from personal interests or relationships.
Policy Compliance:
- Authors, reviewers, and editors are required to adhere to this Conflict of Interest Policy to ensure the integrity and credibility of the publication process.
- Ariston Publishers reserves the right to take appropriate action, including rejection of manuscripts, retraction of published articles, or removal of individuals from editorial roles, in cases of non-compliance with this policy.
- By participating in the publication process with Ariston Publishers, authors, reviewers, and editors acknowledge their understanding of an agreement to comply with this Conflict of Interest Policy.
- This Conflict of Interest Policy is designed to uphold the ethical standards of Ariston Publishers and promote trust and integrity in scholarly publishing.