Editorial Board

Editors-in-Chief

Prof. Dianbao Zhang

Department of Stem Cell and Regenerative Medicine

China Medical University, Shenyang, China

Email: dbzhang@cmu.edu.cn

Editors

 Prof. Lili Jin

School of Life Sciences

Liaoning University, Shenyang, China

Prof. K. K. Sharma

Department of Zoology,

Maharshi Dayanand Saraswati University, Ajmer, India

Prof. B. Kumaran

Endocrinology & Toxicology

Indira Gandhi College of Arts and Science, Pondicherry University, Puducherry-India

Prof. Tao Liu

Department of Natural Products Chemistry

China Medical University, Shenyang China

Dr. Yiming Yang

College of Basic Medical Sciences

Jilin University, Changchun, China

Prof. Reena Mathur

Department of Zoology

Rajasthan University, Jaipur, Rajasthan, India

Prof. A. Subramanyam

Department of Zoology

Annamalai University, Chennai, Tamilnadu, INDIA

Prof. Huazhe Yang

School of Intelligent Medicine

China Medical University, Shenyang, China

Dr. Musthapa Meeran

Biochemistry & Cancer Biology

Central Food Technological Research Institute (CFTRI), Mysore, Karnataka, INDIA

Prof. Iqbal Ahmad

Tej Narayan Banaili, P.G College, Bhagalpur University, Bhagalpur, Bihar, India

Editorial Board Members

Dr. Chuyuan Wang

Department of Endocrinology and Metabolism

The First Hospital of China Medical University, Shenyang, China

Dr. Ruchi Jain

Department of Chemistry

SBSS College, Lalit Narayan Mithila University, Darbhanga, Bihar, India

Dr. Sudhir Kumar

Department of Zoology

Baba Raghav Das Medical College,

Deen Dayal Upadhyaya Gorakhpur University, Gorakhpur University, Uttar Pradesh, India

Dr. Jiayu Chen

Department of Gastroenterology

Kyoto University, Kyoto, Japan

Dr. Tingting Liu

School of Pharmacy

Liaoning Agricultural Vocational and Technical College, Yingkou, China

Dr. Sam A. Masih

Sam Higginbottom University of Agriculture, Technology and Sciences (SHUATS)

Prayagraj, Uttar Pradesh, India

Dr. Yi Xin

School of Management

Tianjin University of Traditional Chinese Medicine, Tianjin, China

Dr. Roli Mathur

Indian Council of Medical Research,

Bioethics Unit, Bengaluru, India

Prof. Yogesh Rawal

Department of Zoology

Punjab University, Chandigarh, India

Dr. Shahla Yasmeen

Department of Zoology

Patna University, Patna, Bihar, India

Dr. Ying Li

Medical Research Center

Affiliated Hospital of Jining Medical University, Jining, China

Dr. Boni Amin Laskar                                             

Fishery Sciences & Zoology

Zoological Survey of India Museum, SOLAN, Himachal Pradesh, India

Dr. Syed Mohi Alam Rizvi

Department of Zoology

Lalit Narayan Mithila University, Darbhanga, Bihar, India

Guide to Authors

Guide to Authors

BioMed and BioSci Advances is a pioneering journal dedicated to advancing the frontiers of biomedical and life sciences through the rapid dissemination of transformative research. Our mission is to provide a dynamic platform for scientists, clinicians, bioengineers, and policymakers to showcase groundbreaking discoveries and innovative solutions to global health and biological challenges.

As a beacon of interdisciplinary collaboration, BioMed and BioSci Advances bridges diverse domains—from molecular biology and genomics to translational medicine and public health—fostering a vibrant exchange of ideas and expertise. We take pride in publishing original research articles, comprehensive reviews, and insightful communications that address critical topics in disease mechanisms, therapeutic development, biomedical technologies, and sustainable healthcare.

Our journal unites researchers and practitioners across disciplines, including:

• Molecular & Cellular Biology
• Clinical & Translational Medicine
• Biotechnology & Bioengineering
• Computational Biology & AI-Driven Healthcare
• Public Health & Epidemiology

We catalyze innovation to drive progress in human health, disease prevention, and biological discovery. BioMed and BioSci Advances is committed to shaping a healthier future through science that matters.

To ensure a seamless submission process and uphold our rigorous quality standards, authors are encouraged to review and comply with the following comprehensive guidelines. These instructions are designed to ensure clarity, consistency, and ethical compliance, enhancing the impact and credibility of your research contributions.

Journal Policy

At BioMed and BioSci Advances, we prioritize the integrity, originality, novelty, and authenticity of published work. Authors are required to adhere to the following journal policies:

Originality and Unpublished Work:

• Submissions must represent original research that has not been published, in whole or in part, in any format, medium, or language.
• Manuscripts must not include text, data, figures, or tables that have been previously reported in journals, conferences, or any other publications.

Plagiarism and Attribution:

• Manuscripts must be free of plagiarism, data fabrication, or improper attribution. Authors are responsible for ensuring that all content is original or properly cited, including figures, tables, and supplementary materials.
• Any detected instance of plagiarism or unethical practices will result in immediate editorial action, including rejection of the manuscript.

Redundant or Duplicate Submissions:

• The submission of redundant or duplicate publications is strictly prohibited. Manuscripts based on prior work must provide substantial new contributions and include clear citations to earlier publications.

Copyright Compliance:

• Authors must ensure their work does not infringe upon existing copyrights. Any use of third-party material must be accompanied by proper permissions and acknowledgments.

Author Responsibilities:

• The corresponding author must provide a declaration affirming the manuscript’s originality and unpublished status upon submission.
• Authors must confirm that their work complies with ethical guidelines and does not violate copyright or intellectual property laws.

General Information

Types of articles

Journal welcomes the publication of various types of articles:

Original Research Articles: These articles present novel research findings, methodologies, or theoretical frameworks in the field of Biomedical, Bioscience, Bioengineering and Biotechnology. Original research articles are not restricted by word count, except for the abstract, which must adhere to a 250-word limit. Authors are encouraged to present their content concisely in accordance with the journal’s standards. Original research articles typically include sections such as Introduction, Methods/Experimental Details, Results, Discussion, and Conclusion. Maximum number of allowed figures for Original research articles are 20.

Review Articles: State-of-the-art review articles provide comprehensive summaries and analyses of existing research literature on specific topics within Biomedical, Bioscience, Bioengineering and Biotechnology. They often offer insights into recent advancements, current trends, and future directions in the field. Review articles have no restrictions on page limits and should include a table of contents. Authors are encouraged to provide biographies and photos for all contributors following the reference section. It is imperative to cite proper references in the captions of all previously published figures, tables, and illustrations, including the authors’ own work. Furthermore, authors must obtain copyright permissions from relevant publishers and authors for the already published figures/tables/texts used in the review article.

Short Communications: Short communications are concise research articles that present significant findings or preliminary results in a brief format. They provide a rapid means of sharing important discoveries with the scientific community. Short communications are concise and should not surpass 2500 words, encompassing elements such as the title page, author affiliations, abstract, keywords, main text, table and figure captions, acknowledgments, and so on. The reference section is excluded from the word count limit. Additionally, short communications should include no more than 20 references.

Perspective Articles: Perspective articles offer personal viewpoints, opinions, or reflections on key issues, debates, or emerging trends in Biomedical, Bioscience, Bioengineering and Biotechnology. They provide insights from experts in the field and stimulate discussion among researchers. Normally, the perspective articles are invited by the journal editors.

Editorials: Editorials are written by the editorial board or guest editors and provide introductions, commentary, or reflections on the content featured in a specific issue of the journal. They may also highlight important developments or initiatives in the field.

Letters to the Editor: Letters to the editor allow readers to communicate feedback, comments, or questions regarding published articles or other aspects of the journal. They provide a platform for scholarly discourse and engagement with the journal’s content.

Subjects Covered (but not limited to):

BioMed and BioSci Advances provides comprehensive coverage of cutting-edge research across all areas of biomedical and biological sciences, with a strong emphasis on interdisciplinary innovation. We welcome original research, reviews, and clinical studies spanning experimental, theoretical, computational, and translational approaches. Topics include, but are not limited to:

Molecular & Cellular Biology

• Genomics, Proteomics, and Metabolomics
• Epigenetics and Gene Regulation
• Signal Transduction and Cell Communication
• Stem Cell Biology and Regenerative Medicine
• CRISPR, Gene Editing, and Synthetic Biology

Disease Mechanisms & Therapeutics

• Cancer Biology and Precision Oncology
• Neurodegenerative & Neurodevelopmental Disorders
• Cardiovascular, Metabolic, and Autoimmune Diseases
• Infectious Diseases & Antimicrobial Resistance
• Immunology, Immunotherapy, and Vaccine Development

Biomedical Technologies & Innovations

• Nanomedicine and Targeted Drug Delivery
• AI-Driven Diagnostics and Digital Pathology
• Wearable Biosensors and Point-of-Care Devices
• Organ-on-a-Chip and 3D Bioprinting
• Biomedical Imaging and Theranostics

Public Health & Epidemiology

• Emerging Infectious Diseases & Pandemic Preparedness
• One Health Approaches (Human-Animal-Environment Interface)
• Global Health Equity and Precision Public Health
• Environmental Health & Disease Prevention
• Antimicrobial Stewardship and Resistance Surveillance

Translational & Clinical Research

• Biomarker Discovery and Personalized Medicine
• Clinical Trials and Therapeutic Development
• Digital Health and Telemedicine
• Medical Ethics and Health Policy

Computational & Systems Biology

• Bioinformatics and Multi-Omics Integration
• Machine Learning in Disease Prediction & Drug Discovery
• Network Biology and Computational Modeling
• Biomedical Big Data Analytics

Sustainable Biomedicine

• Green Biotechnology & Eco-Friendly Therapeutics
• Biomedical Waste Management
• Climate Change and Human Health

Emerging Interdisciplinary Fields

• Neuroengineering and Brain-Computer Interfaces
• Microbiome Research and Gut-Brain Axis
• Aging Biology and Longevity Science
• Space Medicine and Extreme Environment Biology

Case Studies & Clinical Applications

• Real-World Implementation of Precision Medicine
• Innovative Healthcare Delivery Models
• Rare Disease Research and Patient Advocacy

Quick Guide to Authors

Welcome to BioMed and BioSci Advances (BBA)! Below is a guide to assist authors in preparing and submitting their manuscript:

Manuscript Preparation:

1. Language and Style: Manuscripts should be written in clear, concise, and grammatically correct English. Authors are encouraged to seek professional editing services if necessary.

2. Novelty and Originality: Ensure the novelty of the manuscript by verifying that it unveils original research findings that have not been previously published or are concurrently under review for publication elsewhere.

3. Formatting: Follow our formatting guidelines closely. Use the BBA manuscript template available on the journal website to format your submission. Manuscripts should be formatted according to the journal’s template, including font size, style, margins, and line spacing. Include all required sections such as Title, Abstract, Keywords, Introduction, Methods/Experimental details, Results, Discussion, Conclusion, References, and Supplementary Materials (if applicable).

4. Title and Abstract: Craft a concise and informative title that accurately reflects the content of your manuscript. Provide an abstract summarizing the key findings and significance of your research.

5. Keywords: Incorporate a set of keywords that succinctly encapsulate the principal subjects and themes explored in your manuscript, facilitating its searchability and indexing.

6. Introduction: Provide a clear and compelling introduction that outlines the background, objectives, and significance of your research.

7. Materials and Methods: Describe the materials, experimental setup, and methodologies used in your study in sufficient detail to allow reproducibility by other researchers.

8. Results and Discussion: Present your results objectively and comprehensively. Interpret the findings and discuss their implications within the context of existing literature.

9. Figures and Tables: Submit high-quality figures and tables with appropriate captions. Ensure that all visuals are original or properly cited and meet the technical specifications outlined in the submission guidelines.

10. Conclusions: Concisely outline the primary findings of the research and deliberate on their wider implications.
11. Ethical Considerations: Ensure compliance with ethical standards, including obtaining necessary approvals for studies involving human participants, animals, or sensitive data. Provide a clear statement of conflict of interest and funding disclosures.

12. References: Cite relevant literature accurately and consistently. Ensure that all sources are properly cited and listed in the reference section.

Submission Process:

• Online Submission: Utilize the online submission platform to submit the manuscript, adhering to the guidelines outlined on the website. Make sure to follow the prescribed TEMPLATE for file submission.

• Cover Letter: Write a brief cover letter introducing your manuscript to the editorial team. Highlight the significance of your research and its contribution to the field.

• Manuscript Files: Upload your manuscript files, including the main text, figures, tables, and any supplementary materials, using the online submission system. Make sure to follow the designated TEMPLATE for file submission.

Review Process:

• Editorial Evaluation: Upon submission, your manuscript will undergo an initial editorial evaluation to ensure that it meets the journal’s criteria for scope, originality, and quality.

• Peer Review Process: If deemed suitable for further consideration, your manuscript will be sent for peer review. Experts in the field will evaluate the scientific merit, methodology, and significance of your research.

• Reviewer Feedback: You will receive feedback from the peer reviewers, which may include suggestions for revisions or clarifications. Address any comments or concerns raised by the reviewers in a timely manner.

Decision Process:

• Editorial Decision: Based on the peer reviewers’ feedback and the manuscript’s overall suitability for publication, the editorial team will make a decision regarding acceptance, rejection, or the need for revisions.

• Notification: You will be notified of the editorial decision via email. If revisions are requested, you will receive detailed instructions on how to address the reviewers’ comments.

• Revisions (if applicable): Revise your manuscript according to the feedback provided by the peer reviewers and the editorial team. Make sure to submit the revised manuscript within the specified time-frame.

Publication Process:

• Final Approval: Once your revised manuscript is submitted, it will undergo a final review to ensure that all revisions have been addressed satisfactorily.

• Proofreading: You will receive proofs of your manuscript for final approval before publication. Review the proofs carefully for any errors or inaccuracies.

• Publication: Upon final approval, your manuscript will be published online in BioMed and BioSci Advances. You will receive information about the publication date and a link to access your published article.

• Open Access: BioMed and BioSci Advances follows an open access policy, making your research freely available to readers worldwide. Your published article will be accessible on the journal’s website, maximizing its impact and visibility in the scientific community.

Submission Checklist

1. Designate a corresponding author: A corresponding author with full contact details (Email, Phone, Full postal address) should be provided.

2. Uploaded Files: Ensure that all necessary files have been uploaded, including:

• Graphical Abstract (Colored graphical figure with short description of the work)
• Research Highlights (3-5 bullet points)
• Cover Letter
• Manuscript file which include
  • Title page including manuscript title, authors names and their affiliations, corresponding author name, email, phone number, and postal address.
  • Abstract
  • Keywords
  • Text
  • Figures with appropriate captions and proper citation inside the main text
  • Tables with appropriate captions and proper citation inside the main text
  • Acknowledgements, if applicable
  • Conflict of Interest Statement
  • Authors contribution statement
  • References (All references should be cited in the main text as mentioned in the reference list)
  • Supplementary files, if applicable.

• A list of 3 reviewers should be provided who might review the manuscript.
• Manuscript should be prepared in correct English language. Spell and grammar checked should be done before the submission
• Permission should be obtained for the copyrighted material from the original source, if applicable.

Manuscript Preparation:

General Information

Language and Submission Method: Manuscripts should be written in English and submitted electronically through our online submission system. This facilitates efficient processing and review.

Formatting Guidelines: Authors should strictly adhere to the journal’s formatting guidelines, available in the Manuscript Template downloadable from our website. These guidelines ensure consistency and adherence to publication standards.

Clarity and Organization: Manuscripts should be concise, well-organized, and written with clarity. This enhances readability and understanding of the research presented, contributing to the overall quality of the publication.

Abbreviations: In instances where abbreviations are not commonly recognized within the field, it is imperative to define them in a footnote on the first page of the article. Additionally, any abbreviations deemed necessary in the abstract should be defined at their initial mention within the abstract itself and reiterated in the footnote. Consistency in the use of abbreviations throughout the article is crucial for clarity and comprehension. Therefore, authors should ensure uniformity in the application of abbreviations across all sections of the manuscript.

Nomenclature and Units: Adhering to internationally accepted rules and conventions is paramount when presenting nomenclature and units within a manuscript. The use of the International System of Units (SI) is strongly recommended. In cases where other units or quantities are referenced, it is essential to provide their equivalents in SI units. Authors are encouraged to consult authoritative sources such as the International Union of Pure and Applied Chemistry (IUPAC) Nomenclature of Organic Chemistry for comprehensive guidance on nomenclature conventions. By following these standards, authors ensure consistency, accuracy, and adherence to established scientific practices.

Title Page: Each submission should include a title page containing essential information:

Names and Affiliations of All Authors: Provide the full names and institutional affiliations of all contributing authors.

Corresponding Author’s Contact Information: Include the contact details of the corresponding author, such as email address and affiliation. This facilitates communication throughout the submission and review process.

Manuscript Structure

The manuscript structure outlined here provides a systematic framework for organizing and presenting research findings in a clear, coherent, and comprehensive manner. Each section plays a distinct yet interconnected role in communicating the research process, outcomes, and implications to the scientific community.

Title of the Manuscript: The title should accurately reflect the content and focus of the research.

Abstract: A succinct and informative abstract is necessary for any research manuscript. It should succinctly outline the research’s objectives, key findings, and principal conclusions. Since abstracts are often read independently of the full article, they must effectively summarize the study’s essence. Authors should refrain from using non-standard or uncommon abbreviations. If unavoidable, such abbreviations must be defined upon their first mention within the abstract itself to ensure clarity and comprehension. Thus, a concise and informative abstract, not exceeding 250 words, should be included.

Keywords: Authors are encouraged to provide 3-5 keywords below the abstract to facilitate indexing and enhance the discoverability of the manuscript. Carefully selected keywords improve the visibility of the publication in relevant databases and search engines.

Introduction: The introduction serves as the gateway to the research, providing readers with a concise yet comprehensive overview of the study’s background, objectives, and significance. It lays the groundwork for the research by presenting relevant literature, defining the research problem, and clearly stating the study’s aims and objectives. By contextualizing the research within the broader scientific landscape, the introduction sets the stage for the subsequent sections of the manuscript.

Experimental Section: The experimental section provides a detailed account of the materials, methods, and procedures employed in the study. It offers sufficient information to enable reproducibility, allowing other researchers to replicate the experiments and validate the findings. Authors should meticulously describe the experimental setup, including any equipment or instruments used, as well as the procedures followed to collect and analyze data. Clear and precise documentation of the experimental methodology enhances the transparency and credibility of the research.

Results and Discussion: In the results and discussion section, authors present the outcomes of the study and critically analyze their implications. This section is where the research findings are showcased, often through the use of tables, figures, and graphs. Authors should interpret the results in the context of existing literature, highlighting any significant trends, patterns, or deviations observed. Discussion of the findings should delve into their broader implications, addressing how they contribute to advancing scientific knowledge and understanding. This section may also encompass comparisons with previous studies, explanations for unexpected results, and suggestions for future research directions.

Conclusion: The conclusion encapsulates the main findings of the study and emphasizes their significance in relation to the research objectives. It provides a concise summary of the key findings, reiterating the main points discussed in the results and discussion section. Authors may also offer insights into the practical implications of the research and propose avenues for further investigation. By synthesizing the study’s outcomes, the conclusion reinforces the study’s contribution to the field and underscores its relevance and potential impact.

Figures: In the realm of academic publishing, figures serve as vital tools for visually communicating complex data and findings. To ensure their effectiveness, figures should adhere to rigorous standards of quality and clarity. The resolution for all figures should not be less than 300 dpi.

High-Quality Presentation: Figures should be meticulously crafted to uphold a standard of excellence in visual representation. Clear imaging and precise labeling are essential to facilitate comprehension and interpretation by readers. Authors should prioritize the creation of visually appealing and informative figures that enhance the overall professionalism of the manuscript.

File Format and Resolution: Authors must adhere to specific file format and resolution requirements when submitting figures. Figures should be provided in TIFF, JPEG, or EPS format to ensure compatibility with the publication process. Additionally, figures must maintain a minimum resolution of 300 dots per inch (dpi) to guarantee optimal clarity and legibility. Compliance with these standards ensures seamless integration of figures into the manuscript and enhances their visual impact.

Tables: Tables play a fundamental role in organizing and presenting data in a structured and accessible format. Proper formatting and presentation of tables are essential to facilitate understanding and interpretation by readers.

Editability and Format: Authors are advised to ensure that tables are editable and provided in DOC or DOCX format. This enables ease of access and manipulation, allowing for efficient formatting adjustments or updates as necessary. Providing tables in editable formats enhances their usability and facilitates any necessary revisions or modifications during the publication process.

Clarity and Organization: Tables should be meticulously organized and clearly labeled to facilitate easy comprehension by readers. Authors should employ concise and informative table titles and headings, ensuring that data are presented logically and coherently. Clear formatting and consistent use of fonts and styles contribute to the overall professionalism and readability of the tables within the manuscript.

Reference style:

References in the manuscript must adhere to the Harvard style, presented on a dedicated page and numbered in accordance with their appearance in the text. Numerical citations in the text should be enclosed within brackets [ ], corresponding to the sequential order of references listed at the end of the manuscript. The formatting for listing references follows the Harvard Referencing format. Example for the references are as follows:

Journal Articles:

[1] Li, Y., Min, J., Jiang, Y., Dong, T., Xu, D., Feng, Z., Yan, Y., Garoufalis, C.S., Baskoutas, S., Shen, H. and Zeng, Z., 2024. Rational Design of Tetrahedral Derivatives as Efficient Light-Emitting Materials Based on “Super Atom” Perspective. Nano Letters, 24(10), pp.3237-3242.

Book:

[1] Andrews, D., Nann, T. and Lipson, R.H., 2019. Comprehensive Nanoscience and Nanotechnology. Academic press.

Book Chapters:

[1] Benelmekki, M. and Erbe, A., 2019. Nanostructured thin films–background, preparation and relation to the technological revolution of the 21st century. In Frontiers of Nanoscience (Vol. 14, pp. 1-34). Elsevier.

For Patents:

[1] Rogers, J.A., Rockett, A.A., Nuzzo, R., Yoon, J. and Baca, A., University of Illinois, 2015. Arrays of ultrathin silicon solar microcells. U.S. Patent 9,105,782.

Instructions to prepare Graphical Abstract

Authors are required to submit a graphical abstract along with the manuscript for publication in the journal. A graphical abstract serves as a visual summary of the article, providing readers with a quick overview of the research findings. Below are guidelines on how to prepare a graphical abstract and the limitations for its description:

Preparing a Graphical Abstract:

Content: Graphical abstract should highlight the key points of the research, including the main objectives, methodologies, and significant findings.

Design: Preferably, use color to enhance the visual appeal of the graphical abstract. Ensure that the design is clear, concise, and visually engaging.

Size: The maximum dimensions for the graphical abstract should be 4 cm (Height) X 10 cm (Width).

Resolution: Maintain a resolution of at least 300 dots per inch (dpi) to ensure clarity and legibility.

Submission: Submit the graphical abstract as a separate file along with the manuscript during the submission process.

Limitations for the Description of the Graphical Abstract:

Length: The description accompanying the graphical abstract should be concise and limited to a maximum of 20 words.

Content: Focus on conveying the unique aspects and key findings of the research within the limited word count.

Clarity: Ensure that the description provides a clear and accurate summary of the graphical abstract, enabling readers to grasp the essence of the research at a glance.

We encourage authors to adhere to these guidelines to create an effective graphical abstract that complements your manuscript.

ETHICAL COMPLIANCE:

Authors submitting manuscripts to our journal are expected to adhere to high ethical standards throughout the research process. This includes but is not limited to ensuring that the research conducted is in compliance with relevant ethical guidelines and regulations, obtaining necessary approvals from institutional review boards or ethics committees, and obtaining informed consent from participants when applicable. Authors should also disclose any potential conflicts of interest, including sources of funding or any affiliations that may influence the interpretation of the research findings.

Authors Contribution Statement:

In the Authors Contribution Statement, authors are required to clearly outline the specific contributions of each individual involved in the research project. This may include conceptualization, methodology, data collection and analysis, writing, editing, and review of the manuscript. Each author should provide a brief description of their role in the study to ensure transparency and accountability in authorship.

Informed Consent Statement:

Authors conducting research involving human subjects are obligated to obtain informed consent from participants prior to their involvement in the study. The Informed Consent Statement should detail the procedures followed to obtain consent, including information provided to participants about the purpose of the study, risks and benefits, confidentiality, and their right to withdraw participation at any time. Authors should also specify whether written or verbal consent was obtained and provide assurance that participants’ rights were respected throughout the research process.

Acknowledgements:

The Acknowledgements section provides authors with the opportunity to express gratitude to individuals or organizations that contributed to the research project but do not meet the criteria for authorship. This may include funding agencies, research assistants, technical support staff, or colleagues who provided valuable feedback or assistance. Authors should ensure that all individuals acknowledged have granted permission to be included in the Acknowledgements section.

Conflict of Interest:

Authors must declare any potential conflicts of interest that could be perceived as influencing the research process or the interpretation of the findings. This may include financial interests, employment affiliations, consulting arrangements, or personal relationships that could bias the results or create the perception of bias. Authors should provide a clear statement indicating any conflicts of interest and describe how they were managed throughout the research process to maintain integrity and objectivity.

Authorship Changes:

Authors are strongly advised to carefully deliberate the composition and sequence of authors before submitting their manuscript. The final roster of authors should be furnished upon initial submission. Any modifications to the authorship—whether additions, deletions, or reordering—must be proposed prior to the manuscript’s acceptance and necessitate approval from the Editor. To initiate an authorship change, the corresponding author must furnish the Editor with the following: (a) A comprehensive rationale for the proposed alteration in the author list. (b) Written confirmation, such as an email or letter, from all authors endorsing the addition, removal, or reordering of authors. In cases of additions or removals, consent from the affected author is also mandated. Exceptions to this protocol are granted sparingly. Requests for authorship adjustments post-acceptance will be evaluated by the Editor, albeit only under extraordinary circumstances. Throughout the deliberation process, publication of the manuscript will be temporarily halted. In instances where the manuscript has already been published online, any approved changes will be accompanied by a corrigendum.

Guide for Reviewers and Editors

Guide to Reviewers: BioMed and BioSci Advances

Welcome to the Instructions for Reviewers for BioMed and BioSci Advances. As a valued reviewer, your expertise and insights play a crucial role in maintaining the quality and integrity of the journal’s publications. Your thorough evaluation and constructive feedback are instrumental in shaping the direction of scientific discourse in the field of Biomedical, Bioscience, Bioengineering, and Biotechnology. Below are guidelines to assist you in conducting a comprehensive review of manuscripts submitted to BioMed and BioSci Advances.

• Confidentiality: As a reviewer for BioMed and BioSci Advances, it is crucial to maintain the confidentiality of the manuscripts you are assigned to review. This means refraining from discussing the content of the manuscripts with anyone other than the editorial office. By upholding confidentiality, you contribute to the integrity of the peer review process.
• Timeliness: Time is of the essence in the peer review process. Reviewers are expected to evaluate manuscripts promptly and submit their reports within the specified deadline. If circumstances arise that prevent you from meeting the deadline, it is important to communicate with the editorial office and request an extension in advance.
• Constructive Feedback: Reviewers play a pivotal role in providing constructive feedback to authors. When assessing manuscripts, focus on identifying both strengths and weaknesses. Your comments should be specific, objective, and aimed at helping authors improve their work. Point out areas where the manuscript excels and areas where it could be enhanced.
• Originality and Ethical Standards: Evaluate the originality of the research presented in the manuscript and ensure that it meets ethical standards. Verify that proper citations are provided for previously published work and assess whether the research has been conducted in accordance with ethical guidelines and regulations.
• Content Evaluation: Dive deep into the content of the manuscript and evaluate its significance, novelty, and scientific rigor. Scrutinize the methodology used, the interpretation of results, and the contribution the research makes to the field. Your evaluation should be thorough and objective, focusing on the scientific merit of the work.
• Clarity and Presentation: Assess the clarity and organization of the manuscript. Consider factors such as the writing style, structure, and coherence of the presentation. Provide feedback on how the manuscript could be improved to enhance clarity and readability for readers.
• Recommendation: Based on your evaluation, make a recommendation regarding the manuscript’s fate—whether it should be accepted, revised, or rejected. Justify your recommendation with specific comments and suggestions for improvement. Your recommendation will be instrumental in guiding the editorial decision-making process.
• Conflicts of Interest: Be transparent about any potential conflicts of interest that may influence your review. If you have personal or professional connections to the authors or their research, disclose them to the editorial office. If you feel that a conflict of interest may compromise your impartiality, notify the editorial office immediately.
• Respectful Communication: Maintain professionalism and respect in all communications related to the peer review process. Avoid personal or derogatory remarks and focus solely on the scientific content of the manuscript. Your goal is to provide feedback that is helpful and constructive, regardless of your recommendation.
• Final Decision: Your review will be considered alongside those of other reviewers by the editorial team to make a final decision on the manuscript. Your feedback is invaluable in ensuring the quality and integrity of the research published in BioMed and BioSci Advances. Thank you for your dedication to the peer review process.

Guide to Editors: BioMed and BioSci Advances

Welcome to the comprehensive Guide to Editors for BioMed and BioSci Advances. As an editor for our esteemed journal, your pivotal role revolves around ensuring the quality, integrity, and timely dissemination of groundbreaking research within the realm of Biomedical, Bioscience, Bioengineering, and Biotechnology. This detailed guide is designed to equip you with the necessary instructions and best practices to navigate the editorial process with proficiency and efficacy. Your dedication and commitment as an editor are invaluable to the success and reputation of BioMed and BioSci Advances.

Editorial Workflow:

• Your initial task involves the meticulous assignment of suitable reviewers, drawing upon their expertise and availability to ensure thorough and insightful assessments.
• Efficiently manage the peer review process by overseeing the timely completion of reviews and judiciously evaluating reviewer comments to make informed editorial decisions.
• Maintain proactive communication with authors throughout the review process, providing updates, guidance, and constructive feedback as required.
• Thoughtfully evaluate the feedback provided by reviewers and exercise sound judgment in determining manuscript acceptance, revision, or rejection, upholding the journal’s standards of excellence.

Manuscript Handling:

• Uphold the journal’s submission guidelines rigorously, ensuring that submitted manuscripts adhere to formatting requirements and ethical standards.
• Conduct a comprehensive initial assessment of manuscripts to ascertain their suitability for peer review, considering factors such as novelty, relevance, and scientific rigor.
• Effectively manage revisions and resubmissions, facilitating productive interactions between authors and reviewers to address queries, concerns, or suggestions for improvement.
• Strive for consistency and rigor in the editorial process, upholding the journal’s reputation for scholarly excellence and integrity.

Ethical Considerations:

• Familiarize yourself thoroughly with the journal’s policies on plagiarism, authorship, conflicts of interest, and ethical conduct, ensuring strict adherence to established guidelines.
• Promptly address any instances of ethical misconduct or concerns, conducting impartial investigations and implementing appropriate measures in accordance with established procedures.
• Maintain the utmost confidentiality throughout the editorial process, safeguarding the anonymity of reviewers and respecting the privacy of authors to uphold the integrity of the peer review process.

Collaboration and Communication:

• Foster a collaborative and supportive environment conducive to constructive dialogue and scholarly exchange among authors, reviewers, and editorial board members.
• Encourage open communication and facilitate constructive feedback to foster continuous improvement in manuscript quality and scientific rigor.
• Serve as a liaison between authors and reviewers, facilitating effective communication and resolution of any conflicts or misunderstandings that may arise during the editorial process.

Continuous Improvement:

• Stay abreast of the latest developments and advancements in the field of Biomedical, Bioscience, Bioengineering, and Biotechnology and scholarly publishing, adapting editorial practices to reflect evolving standards and expectations.
• Solicit feedback from authors, reviewers, and colleagues to identify areas for improvement and implement changes that enhance the efficiency, transparency, and effectiveness of the editorial process.
• Strive for continuous improvement in all aspects of editorial management, contributing to the enhancement of the journal’s reputation and impact within the scientific community.

Publication Ethics

Publication Ethics for BioMed and BioSci Advances

At BioMed and BioSci Advances, published by Ariston Publications, we uphold the highest ethical standards in scientific publishing to ensure the integrity, credibility, and trustworthiness of the research we disseminate. Our commitment to ethical practices extends across all stages of the publication process, from manuscript submission to post-publication dissemination. Our publication ethics policies are designed to guide authors, reviewers, editors, and all stakeholders involved in the publishing process. Adherence to these ethical principles is paramount to maintain transparency, fairness, and trust in scholarly communication.

1. Authorship and Author Responsibilities: Authors are expected to adhere to the following ethical principles:

Authorship Criteria:

• Authorship eligibility hinges upon significant contributions to conceiving, designing, executing, or interpreting the research study.
• All contributors with substantial involvement in the work merit authorship recognition, while those offering support or assistance without meeting authorship criteria should be acknowledged accordingly.
• Authors are required to reveal any potential conflicts of interest that could impact the research process or the interpretation of the results.

Originality and Plagiarism:

• Authors bear the responsibility of verifying the originality of their work and confirming that it has not been previously published or is under consideration elsewhere for publication.
• Any form of plagiarism, including self-plagiarism, is unacceptable and will lead to immediate rejection or retraction.
• Any form of plagiarism, whether it involves directly copying text, ideas, or data without appropriate acknowledgment, is strictly forbidden.
• Editors utilize plagiarism detection software to screen submitted manuscripts and address any suspected cases of plagiarism promptly.

Conflict of Interest:

• Authors must reveal any potential conflicts of interest that might impact the research process or the interpretation of the results.
• This includes financial interests, employment affiliations, consulting arrangements, or personal relationships.

Data Integrity:

• Authors bear the responsibility of verifying the accuracy and integrity of their data, presenting research findings with honesty and transparency.
• Studies involving human subjects, animals, or sensitive data must adhere to ethical guidelines and obtain the requisite approvals and permissions.
• Fabrication, falsification, or manipulation of data is considered unethical and constitutes scientific misconduct.

2. Peer Review Process:

• Reviewers must uphold the confidentiality of the peer review process and refrain from sharing any details about the manuscript or their assessment with unauthorized individuals without permission from the journal.
• Peer review is conducted with fairness.
• Reviewers are expected to conduct their evaluations impartially and offer constructive feedback aimed at enhancing the manuscript’s quality.
• Reviewers should declare any potential conflicts of interest and evaluate manuscripts objectively, focusing solely on their scientific quality.
• Editors oversee the peer review process to ensure its integrity and rigor, avoiding bias or favoritism.

3. Editorial Responsibilities:

Editorial Integrity:

• Editors uphold the integrity and quality of the editorial process, maintaining objectivity and impartiality in decision-making.
• Manuscripts are evaluated based on their scientific quality, significance, originality, and methodological rigor, without discrimination based on factors such as race, gender, religion, region, or institutional affiliation.

Conflict of Interest:

Editors are responsible for managing conflicts of interest transparently and impartially, ensuring that they do not compromise the integrity of the editorial process.

Transparency:

Editors should ensure transparency in the publication process by clearly communicating the editorial policies, peer review process, and any conflicts of interest.

4. Post-Publication Concerns:

Corrections and Retractions:

• Authors, editors, and publishers are responsible for promptly addressing errors or inaccuracies in published articles, issuing corrections, clarifications, or retractions as necessary.
• Corrections are published promptly to rectify errors and maintain the integrity of the scientific record.

Ethical Concerns:

Any concerns about ethical issues, such as research misconduct or violations of publication ethics, will be thoroughly investigated by the journal and appropriate actions will be taken.

5. Compliance with Policies and Guidelines:

All stakeholders are expected to comply with the journal’s policies, guidelines, and ethical standards, as well as relevant regulatory requirements and best practices in scholarly publishing.

Indexing and Abstracting

BioMed and BioSci Advances is committed to achieving high visibility and widespread dissemination of the research it publishes. While the journal is currently not indexed, we are actively working towards being indexed in prominent databases and directories relevant to Biomedicine, Bioscience, Bioengineering, and Biotechnology. Our goal is to ensure that the valuable and impactful research published in BioMed and BioSci Advances reaches a broad audience of scholars, researchers, and practitioners in the field.

We are in the process of applying for indexing in key databases and directories, such as Scopus, Web of Science, MEDLINE/PubMed and others, to enhance the visibility and discoverability of articles published in the journal. As we progress in our efforts to expand the journal’s indexing coverage, we aim to increase its impact and ensure that the research published in BioMed and BioSci Advances contributes to the advancement of knowledge and practical solutions in Biomedicine, Bioscience, Bioengineering, and Biotechnology. Stay tuned for updates as we work towards achieving these goals and further elevating the journal’s reach within the global scientific community.

Article Processing Charges

At present, there are no article processing charges (APCs) associated with publishing in BioMed and BioSci Advances. As an open-access journal, all articles are published free of cost to authors. The publisher covers the expenses incurred in the publication process, allowing authors to disseminate their research without any financial burden. There are no fees for submission, processing, or publication of articles in BioMed and BioSci Advances. This approach ensures equitable access to scientific knowledge and supports the dissemination of research findings across the global scientific community.

Manuscript Template

TEMPLATE FOR REVIEW ARTICLES

TEMPLATE FOR RESEARCH ARTICLES

Special Issues

BioMed and BioSci Advances welcomes proposals for special issues that align with the journal’s aims, scope and objectives. Special issues provide an opportunity to delve into specific topics or emerging areas within Biomedicine, Bioscience, Bioengineering, Biotechnology and related fields, offering a focused platform for in-depth exploration and discussion.

If you have a proposal for a special issue, please submit it to the editorial office for consideration. Your proposal should include a brief outline of the proposed topic, its significance and relevance to the field, potential contributors, and a proposed timeline for publication.

Once your proposal is received, it will undergo careful evaluation by the editorial team to assess its suitability for publication in BioMed and BioSci Advances. If approved, you will be invited to serve as a guest editor or co-editor for the special issue, working closely with the editorial team to oversee the review and publication process.

We look forward to receiving your proposals and collaborating with you to bring forth exciting and impactful special issues for our readership.

Please submit the special issue proposal at: info@aristonpubs.com

Conferences

BioMed and BioSci Advances welcomes the opportunity to collaborate with organizers of conferences, symposiums, and workshops to publish special issues or proceedings featuring research articles presented at these events.

If you are organizing a conference or similar academic gathering and wish to publish selected research papers in BioMed and BioSci Advances, we encourage you to reach out to our editorial office with your proposal. Your proposal should include details such as the theme and scope of the conference, the number of anticipated submissions, and a proposed timeline for publication.

Upon receiving your proposal, our editorial team will review it carefully to assess its alignment with the journal’s scope and objectives. If approved, we will work closely with you to facilitate the submission and review process for the conference papers, ensuring timely publication in a dedicated special issue or proceeding.

By publishing conference-related research in BioMed and BioSci Advances, authors can benefit from the journal’s wide readership and open access model, maximizing the visibility and impact of their work within the Biomedical, Bioscience, Bioengineering, and Biotechnology community. We look forward to the opportunity to collaborate with you on showcasing cutting-edge research from your conference in our journal.

Article in Press

Current Issue

Nanoparticles for Advanced Drug Delivery Systems: Innovations, Applications, and Future Perspectives in Nanomedicine

Sadik Tyagi, Mohd Aarim, Salman Khan, Bushra Ahmad, Muzammil Liyakat Mir, Faiqua Haque, Suhaima Safdar, Amreen Fatima, G.G.H.A. Shadab

Summary: Nanoparticles (NPs) enable breakthroughs in drug delivery through targeted, stimuli-responsive systems like liposomes and dendrimers, improving therapeutic outcomes in oncology and neurology. Innovations in green synthesis and DNA nanotechnology enhance sustainability and precision. Challenges include regulatory standardization, toxicity assessment, and scalable production. Future prospects involve AI-optimized designs, gene-editing carriers, and personalized nanomedicine. Interdisciplinary collaboration and ethical frameworks are vital for translating lab advancements into clinical practice, ensuring NPs redefine 21st-century medicine safely and equitably.

Review | PUBLISHED ONLINE: 24 November 2024

ChemSci Advances 1(1), 03-25 (2024)

https://doi.org/10.69626/bba.2024.0003